Pages

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Ho-Lee Cow!

Cliff Lee
Apparently I wasn’t the only one caught off guard by the Cliff Lee signing in Philadelphia.  As Phil Rizzuto would have said, “holy cow”!

So the question needs to be asked, is this the best one-two pitching combination ever with Halladay and Lee?  The answer, at least until next October, is no.  Baseball, as I’ve bored you with before is rich in history and you don’t have to go back far too far to find pitching tandems that had crazy seasons. 

I won’t take you to the time machine and expound upon the exploits of Schoolboy Rowe and Tommy Bridges, but instead look quickly at some more recent dynamic duos. 

The real dynamic duo
Team
Pitcher
Year
Combined Record
Season Result
% of team wins






Arizona
Schilling, Johnson
2001
43-12
Won World Series
46.7%
Arizona
Schilling, Johnson
2002
47-12
Won division
50.5%
Atlanta
Glavine, Maddux
1993
42-16
Lost World Series
40.4%
Detroit
Coleman, Lolich
1971
45-23
2nd Place
49.4%
Houston
Hampton, Lima
1999
43-14
Won Division
44.3%
Yankees
Figueroa, Guidry
1978
45-12
Won World Series
45.0%
Oakland
Hunter,
Blue
1973
45-14
Won World Series
46.4%
Oakland
Stewart,
Welch
1990
49-17
Lost World Series
47.6%

Lee, Halladay
2008-2010
36-9




The last line is the combined average of Lee & Halladay’s last three years.  Anyone reading this doesn’t need any lessons on Halladay’s stats so I won’t bother.  The thing to remember about Lee however is that he isn’t nearly the winner that Halladay is.  This may come as a bit of surprise to some of you but Lee has only been above 14 wins twice in his career.  He had 22 wins in ’08 which relegated Halladay to second in the Cy Young voting that year; and he had 18 wins in ’05.  Other than that, 14 is his max. 

So why is this signing a big deal?  In my opinion there are three reasons. 

1)       Halladay for sure tops Lee in Wins and ERA (by about ½ a run).  Where they are really close to even is in losses and innings pitched.  Historically, there aren’t a lot of pitchers like these guys.  Guys that just don’t lose or experience losing streaks.  They have ‘no-decision’ streaks from time to time, but because they both work deep into games they are often around long enough for the offense to catch up.  Think Seaver or Pedro.   Even in seasons where they don’t win big, the loss totals are still low.   
2)      As much as having Lee in your rotation is fabulous, having Lee in September and October when the games really count is incredible.  Lee is 7-2 with a 2.13 ERA in his post season career with 3 complete games in 10 starts.  Add that to Halladay’s 2-1 record and 2.45 ERA AND 3 complete games in 3 career starts and you have one rested bull pen!
3)      Having an ace behind your ace is an advantage that can’t be taken lightly.  Ask Smoltz or Glavine or Avery or Millwood.  For the 1st time in four years Lee will never have to face the best pitcher on another team.  Halladay will always get the Linecum, Jiminez, Arroyo, Dempster and Garland starts.  Lee will get (on average) pitchers that he should be able to dominate. 
Bob Welch and Barry Bonds never tested positive for Steroids
I don’t expect anything different out of Halladay this year.  He’ll be between 18-22 wins and 6-10 losses.  It’s who he is.  Lee on the other hand could pull a Bob Welch.  Welch was a good pitcher with Dodgers over 10 years.  He was a combined 115-86.  His numbers actually looked a lot like Cliff Lee’s.  He topped out at 16 wins, only had one losing season in 10 years.  Then he was the center piece of a sever player, three team deal and ended up with Oakland.  He pitched behind Oakland’s bona fide number one pitcher Dave Stewart starting in 1988. 

Stewart was coming off of a 20-9 season in which he finished 3rd in the Cy Young voting.  Welch was 15-9 in his final year in LA.  Over the next two years Steward would go 21-12 and 21-9.  Welch would go 17-9 and 17-8.  I’m sure that Dave Duncan (pitching coach) was a factor.  Also, Oakland had some pharmaceutical aids that were known to help players too.  But pitching behind a guy like Stewart who never missed starts and was the unquestioned number one, was probably the biggest single reason for his dramatic improvement.  In their third season together, Stewart would have another Stewart year going 22-11; Welch went a staggering 27-6.  It certainly didn’t hurt that the entirely American League only had 4 teams over .500 that year and it also didn’t hurt that Welch never had to worry about facing anyone else’s ace. 

Jayson Werth
 Oops...This is Jayson Worth
Lee could have one of those stupid win years.   If Lee and Halladay combined for 50 wins I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised.  I wonder now if Jayson Werth would like to undo his deal with the Nationals. 

As much as this 1-2 punch has the potential to be ridiculous, the 1-2-3-4 punch could be legend.  The only two staffs that I can think of that compare are:  Baltimore 1971 and Atlanta 1998.  Its tough and rare to go 4 deep.  Philly now has Cole Hamels who was a number 2 starter as the fourth man in the rotation.  Roy Oswalt who was a legit number one in Houston is now the third starter in Philly.  Wow.
Team
Year
Pitcher
Record
ERA





Baltimore
1971
Mike Cuellar
20-9
3.08

1971
Pat Dobson
20-8
2.90

1971
Jim Palmer
20-9
2.68

1971
Dave McNally
21-5
2.68
Total


81-31
50 over 500
Atlanta
1993
Greg Maddux
20-10
2.36

1993
Tom Glavine
22-6
3.20

1993
Steve Avery
18-6
2.94

1993
John Smoltz
15-11
3.62
Total


75-33
42 over 500
Phillies
2010
Roy Halladay
17-9
2.44

2010
Cliff Lee
16-9
3.08

2010
Roy Oswalt
16-9
2.76

2010
Cole Hamels
14-10
3.06
Total


63-37
26 over 500

While 26 games over (based on pitchers average win totals) may not look too impressive, remember that everyone, save Halladay, will be pitching against vastly inferior competition than they are accustomed to. 

Justin Verlander
So how much will the level of competition matter?  I think it will matter tons!  If you have a C.C Sabathia Vs. Justin Verlander matchup, you’re probably thinking it would be a good game.  Sabathia Vs Armando Galarraga?  Now you’d have to bet on a Yankee win. 

Starting pitchers in the National League don’t generally get as many wins their AL brethren.  Mostly that is due to the much talked about and highly overrated pinch hitting and over-managing that takes place. 

Last year in the NL the second winningest pitcher on each team averaged 11.5 wins.   Lee and his historical average of 16 wins, will be pitching against guys who can reasonably expect to be around 11 or 12 wins for the year.  How many of those would come against a guy like Lee?

Oswalt, (16 wins as well) will be pitching against 3rd starters how last year in the NL averaged a whooping 9.5 wins over 162 games. 
Heidi Hamels
The differential gets crazy with Hamels.  Number four starters in the NL got roughly half of Hamels win total for last year at 7.4 for the season.

This staff could be one of the best ever; however December projections rarely pan out.  The good news is that there is only one knuckle-head on the staff and I’m sure the vets will be more than able to keep Hamels under wrap. 

Prediction:  90 wins from the Phillies rotation without knowing who the 5th starter is. 

2 comments:

  1. Only problem is that Oswalt and Halladay will be 33 starting next season. Lee turns 33 midway through next season. Yes, the Phillies could dominate, but with the age of their big 3, the window for this domination won't be a long one.

    Hiedi Hamels is hot!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. JZ: Agreed. Hamels is the wild card for me. 30+ year old pitchers DO break down, but you can't knock the work ethic of Lee and the Roys. (Lee-Roys, should have thought of that earlier). If the fickle finger of fate takes one or more of them out it won't be because they went "David Wells".

    ReplyDelete